E-mail Story   Print Story
  Comments (0) Total Wednesday Apr. 23, 2014
LETTER: Mutual Respect Required for Successful Collaboration on Forest Plan
Allen Chrisman’s letter (Dec. 18 Beacon: “Work Collaboratively on Forest Plan”) defending the Flathead National Forest from criticism by Keith Hammer asserts that “The Forest Service made no commitment to the Whitefish Range Partnership that they would adopt our recommendation intact.”

That’s correct — but Hammer never alleged such a commitment. He merely argued that remarks about the Whitefish Range Partnership’s agreement by the FNF’s supervisor and chief planner were gratuitously complimentary, thus prejudicial, and therefore amounted to favoritism. I agree.

Hammer did not criticize the WRP. But Chrisman chose to criticize Hammer, and to criticize him in a deliberately patronizing manner that not only is without merit, but that is not in keeping with the civility and mutual respect required for successful collaboration in the larger forest plan revision process of which both men are a part.

James Conner
No comments have been posted for this article.

Kellyn Brown
Kellyn Brown21h
I spent an afternoon in the park with a really cool kid named Jacob for this story on autism awareness. http://t.co/9UNSqZSfWV
Dillon Tabish
Dillon Tabish2h
Big happy birthday to @kellynjbrown!
Molly Priddy
Molly Priddy19h
@Lubchansky Where are you on this pain scale? http://t.co/U2MDitEdpl
Tristan Scott
Tristan Scott19 Apr
The Replacements just played with Billy Joe accompaniment! And played an encore! #Coachella2014
Flathead Beacon
FB Headlines3h
Tourist Season Is Coming. Are You Ready? http://t.co/PcIWeEhx79