E-mail Story   Print Story
  Comments (0) Total Thursday Apr. 24, 2014
 
Missoula Rethinking Anti-Panhandling Ordinance
Federal judge in Idaho barred Boise from enacting most of its anti-panhandling ordinance
MISSOULA — The Missoula City Council might have to change an ordinance it recently passed restricting panhandling following a federal judge's decision in Idaho that barred the city of Boise from enacting most of its anti-panhandling ordinance.

City officials say the Missoula ordinance is similar to the Boise ordinance and could be challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union.

"Obviously, it suggests that a constitutional challenge to the Missoula ordinance would be successful," Anna Conley, staff attorney for the ACLU of Montana, told the Missoulian.

U.S. District Judge Edward Lodge wrote in the ruling Thursday that people have a right to ask others for charitable donations in public places, and the First Amendment right can't be ignored just because panhandling makes some uncomfortable.

"Freedom of speech may be the most important right to protect in order to maintain our republic," Lodge wrote. "In public places, all citizens must tolerate speech they don't agree with, find to be a nuisance, insulting or outrageous."

The Missoula City Council last month amended the law to prohibit sitting, sleeping or lying in some places to limit panhandling. The ACLU of Montana opposed the changes.

Missoula City Councilman Adam Hertz said he's asked the Administration and Finance Committee to look into changing the ordinance at a meeting on Wednesday. He said the council could take up the issue next week.

"I think we ought to go back and take a look at this before we potentially take on a lawsuit from the ACLU that they already have proven essentially they can win," said Hertz.

Mayor John Engen said he could veto the recent changes, but he'd rather the council amend the law. He said he's talking with the ACLU about ways to move forward that preserve the intent of the ordinance while eliminating potential legal action.

"For better or for worse, a decision in Boise doesn't necessarily mean there will be a similar decision in Montana, but if we can stay out of a courtroom in general, we all have more control over our destinies," said Engen. "So we'll see if there's any room for agreement here with the ACLU."

In the Idaho decision, Lodge said the aggressive solicitation portion of the Boise ordinance and the ban on soliciting donations in roadways appear to involve a compelling government interest, and those portions of the ordinance can go into effect as planned.
 
No comments have been posted for this article.

 
Kellyn Brown
Kellyn Brown8h
@kellynbrown
Former pro skier has plans for an academy for young adults looking to train in the outdoors http://t.co/YFOI9pdVVf http://t.co/R8NCamjqUD
Dillon Tabish
Dillon Tabish3h
@djtabish
Young Lakers eager to prove themselves this legion baseball season http://t.co/0kqbOczmeK #mtscores http://t.co/D5jukSZQJt
Molly Priddy
Molly Priddy4h
@mollypriddy
@Slate Jealousy?
Tristan Scott
Tristan Scott4h
@tristanscott
@hike734 Thanks, Jake!
Flathead Beacon
FB Headlines2h
@flatheadbeacon
NRA Seeks Universal Gun Law at National Meeting http://t.co/774jGB5cYS