Sunday Apr. 20, 2014
Comments on:
Policy shaping up that could ban assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines
Let’s be civil.
The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), accuse someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail webmaster [at] flatheadbeacon.com.

The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.

  Newest First
By Craig moore on 01-10-13 @ 12:48 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
24 up | 35 down


Learn from a “lefty” why this is such utter nonsense to promote form over substance. 
http://kontradictions.wordpress.com/2012/08/09/why-not-renew-the-assault-weapons-ban-well-ill-tell-you/

===quote===
Summary
If gun control advocates want to actually have meaningful discussion and debate about the
“assault weapon” and “high capacity” ban, they MUST address these questions:
- Why ban cosmetic features?
- Why ban guns used in a mere 2% of crime?
- Why base gun control legislation on rare and statistically insignificant mass shootings to
begin with?
- Why ban magazines that have been consistently sized since their invention?
- How would banning these magazines have saved lives, given that all a shooter needs is multiple
magazines and 3 seconds of time (i.e. Cho)?
- How will a ban on either these weapons or magazines reduce crime, since there are many
millions of them legal and available anyway, especially since production has ramped up after the
ban’s expiration?

And most importantly:

After a decade of failure, why assume that the bans will reduce violent crime THIS time around?
===end quote===
By HRH Prince Michael on 01-10-13 @ 12:58 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
17 up | 23 down


MORE, vapid and weak Political Theatre?  Time, for a -GODLY- Reality Check:
Psalm 110 (1.10 2013 - Year of His Victory) is NOW,
The House of David 2 Chronicles 13 Victory, is HERE:
http://www.all4webs.com/q/f/love4yahweh
http://www.flickr.com/photos/72265268@N08
By GATE on 01-10-13 @ 1:52 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
22 up | 33 down


PRAVDA: ” America, never give up your Guns’!
By JCW on 01-10-13 @ 6:57 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
21 up | 25 down


Wyoming is creating “Gun Protection” legislation.  Montana should do the same.  And quickly.
By Craig moore on 01-10-13 @ 7:14 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
19 up | 31 down


Whatever happen, most likely, will be done by imperial fiat.  The WSJ explains why legislation
is not possible:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324081704578234010962821032.html
By GATE on 01-11-13 @ 5:37 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
24 up | 34 down


Theses demagogues took an oath to protect and defend the ENTIRE Constitution. If they continue to
spit on it, IMPEACHMENT is the next course of action!
By hotfishmt on 01-11-13 @ 11:24 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
21 up | 18 down


An editorial in the Interlake Newspaper today…hit the nail on the head. It was about
the “former” hospital for the insane or mentally ill people. It talked about all the mental hospital
that are now dormant and not used. One cannot have effective control of gun objects unless
mental health is addressed.
When I was a kid back East. there was a hospital for the mentally insane, and the people that I
did see first hand….were wacky as a goofy looney. Yet, the hospital/farm grew its own produce
& had dairy/beef cattle and I for one think its time to bring back the “bars for the criminally
insane and take some of the weep easy judges & loophole lawyers out of the mix and deal with
mentally ill people like old times….rather than drug them into a coma with high powered drugs.
By mooseberryinn on 01-11-13 @ 5:08 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
18 up | 33 down


Once again - Obama/Biden/Communists - are not about solving any “problems”, they are all about
attacking the 2nd Amendment.
By waterman on 01-12-13 @ 1:46 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
14 up | 25 down


I think Biden could have saved some time and dollars by just having our muslim dictator sign the
executive order. Everybody knows this game of charades is nothing but posturing. So they can
say they did the research and their first knee jerk reaction of an excuse is the best one to limit our
freedoms even further. All in name of saving lives. Then they will claim credit for solving this,
decade long, national debate in 2 months.
The reality is they are not even touching the root of the problem. To many people want the gov’t to
take care of them for life. They think they can escape work and live a life of luxury.  You cannot
legislate warped human behavior w/more regulations. It is a sign of a sick gov’t and society.
Gov’t policies to appease the minorty groups. 1)- Taking god and prayer out of schools, public
gatherings, and elsewhere- has lead to our own demise. 2)- Not allowing disciplinary action on
children in schools and by parents is bearing the fruit we planted. 3)- Allowing the gov’t to release
the mentally sick from medical help and prisons- has lead to poison in our society. 4)- The gov’t
hand picking federal judges to carry out the ruling parties policies to avoid having congress do
their job.
We the people- are the underliying cause of these failed gov’t policies. By re-electing the extreme
liberal politicians back time and time again and expect something new and better to happen. And
we just keep going downhill at a faster rate wth each election, expecting some miraculous turn
around.
By Fast on 01-12-13 @ 8:39 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
14 up | 16 down


Marines should be the only ones to own guns. Because the rest or less.
By GATE on 01-13-13 @ 9:15 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
12 up | 21 down


Ol’ Joe’s Tragedy Exploitation Team should recommend the elimination of Armed Guards for the
President, Himself, their families and establish ‘Gun Free Zones’ around them. This should make
Feinstein, Schumer and all the loonies at msnbc all warm and fuzzy and put this issue of ‘Gun Control’
to rest once and for all!
By Craig moore on 01-13-13 @ 6:46 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
6 up | 15 down


Remember the letter published here in 2009 to Eric Holder?
http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/baucus_tester_tell_holder_to_stay_away_from_guns/8655

===quote===
Dear Attorney General Holder:

This letter is in regards to your recent comments suggesting the reinstatement of the ban on
assault weapons. We oppose reinstating the ban on the sale of assault weapons, and we call on
the Department of Justice to enforce existing laws before it considers imposing any new
restrictions on gun ownership.

Your comments noted increased violence among international drug traffickers as a reason to
reexamine the ban on assault weapons within this country; however, this statement fails to
acknowledge laws already in place that work to address this issue. Under current law, both
transferring a firearm to someone knowing that it will be used to commit a violent or
drug-trafficking crime as well as possessing a firearm in furtherance of a Federal drug
trafficking crime are already federal felonies punishable by imprisonment.

We will strongly oppose any legislation that will infringe upon the rights of individual gun
owners. We value our outdoor heritage, and a large part of that is our Second Amendment right to
keep and bear arms. Passing this heritage down from one generation to the next is a sacred part
of being a Montanan, and something that we will always fight to protect. In the light of the
Supreme Court’s landmark ruling of District of Columbia v. Heller, affirming the Second
Amendment right to bear arms as an individual and constitutionally protected right, we urge you
to avoid any legislative proposals that would jeopardize the Constitutional right of law-abiding
Americans to own firearms.

Sincerely,
U.S. Senator Max Baucus
U.S. Senator Jon Tester
===end quote===
By mooseberryinn on 01-14-13 @ 9:22 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
5 up | 10 down


Nice letter from Max and Jon - but how would they vote?  PLAIN TRUTH - 1.  Laws effect only the law
abiding.  2.  There are millions of “assault rifles/pistols” available to be stolen.  3.  there are millions of
extended magazines available to be stolen or fabricated.  4.  Banning something doesn’t make it
disappear.  5.  This Comrade obama and his regime are not trying to fix wacko shooters in theaters or
schools, they are trying to infringe upon our 2nd amendment rights.
By GATE on 01-17-13 @ 7:28 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
3 up | 2 down


With this new ‘touchy-feely’ batch of useless dribble that does nothing to curb Gun violence, a Citizen
may want to post the following sign on their property: “Due to the price Increase of Ammunition..Do not
expect a warning Shot”!
 
Kellyn Brown
Kellyn Brown3h
@kellynbrown
County denies beekeeper a license to sell honey http://t.co/Q02rAuPa7d Kalispell man failed health inspection but says he doesn't need one
Dillon Tabish
Dillon Tabish19 Apr
@djtabish
KALISPELL, MT: You'll find the box in a brick building filled with history. Skateboards, pizza, clocks & ties #THTH14
Molly Priddy
Molly Priddy18 Apr
@mollypriddy
@natashavc @TaraAriano @allyzay Oh no, I've been thinking it's a room for all your types of mustards. Recalibrating my ideas now.
Tristan Scott
Tristan Scott19 Apr
@tristanscott
@tristanscott *Billie Joe
Flathead Beacon
FB Headlines8h
@flatheadbeacon
Kalispell’s Core Area Redevelopment Plan Inches Forward http://t.co/EO2le2frPY