Thursday May. 24, 2012
Comments on:
Tennis Courts
Let’s be civil.
The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), convict someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail webmaster [at] flatheadbeacon.com.

The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.

By Junior on 01-13-10
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


This is the way Senate Republicans wanted it. A system that lacked accountability to the taxpayers and what we got was ‘rubber tiled’ tennis courts.

Remember that it was reported on Dec. 28th and the Governor said this was not a good use of funds as reported on Dec. 29th. All session he battled with the Senate Republicans to have a line-itemized detailed list, but instead they put in some language that allowed city and county commissioners to act like kids at a candy story. That language required the Department of Commerce to spend the money on any project the fit into the Republican bill.

That is exactly the way Republicans wanted it as Story said, “he thinks lawmakers did it right by not doling out the money to specific city projects.” “Also we were concerned that if the governor didn’t like someone’s projects, he would go through and line-item veto it.”http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_07d9d5f2-f4d6-11de-809d-001cc4c002e0.html

You can guarantee the Governor would have vetoed ‘rubber-tiled’ tennis courts just like he vetoed other stimulus money. But then again Senate President Story, Dan McGee, and Esp wanted to spend that money too. The best part of this op-ed is the second paragraph title ‘Too much in savings account.’ http://billingsgazette.com/news/opinion/guest/article_1534112f-cc88-58e5-bbe7-d8aa98633368.html

Just because you have a big chocolate cake in front of you, it doesn’t mean you should eat all of it.