Friday Feb. 10, 2012
Comments on: Court Rules Against Whitefish in Slope Lawsuit
Let’s be civil.
The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), convict someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail webmaster [at] flatheadbeacon.com.

The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.

By MontanaTrace on 11-02-09
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


We need some new thinking. Thank goodness the law suit losing city attorney is leaving. Now vote out the incumbent city councilor.
By Whitefish on 11-03-09
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


The Walton’s should have been issued a Reasonable Use Exemption.

The RUE would not have exempted them from following CAO regulations.

The RUE would apply that no other reasonable economic use with less impact on sensitive areas and that the proposed development does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, on or off the proposed site.