Friday Feb. 10, 2012
Comments on: Hazy: Montana’s Smoking Ban Doesn’t Apply to Tribal Venues
Let’s be civil.
The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), convict someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail webmaster [at] flatheadbeacon.com.

The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.

By senator blutarski on 10-31-09
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


Let the market decide. Non smokers are free to go elsewhere if they don’t like smoking. The last I heard tobacco was a legal substance and it should be the property owner’s decision.
By Mary F on 10-31-09
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


I think that if you “post” that you are a smoking establishment,  then on an indian reservation you should have the right to be a smoking establishment.  Not just on a reservation but any where.  People have the right not to smoke, and not to be exposed to second hand smoke.  But the smokers have the right to smoke if they so choose.  Don’t take the rights of our citizens away.
By AmonAmarth on 11-01-09
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


Goodbye good riddance to the smokers. It isn’t gonna change so stop whining about it. Hell, here’s an idea quit smoking and forget about it. In the end you might save some money and actually feel healthier at the end of the day….what a novel idea.

On the other hand…smoke it up, die faster, the non smokers will still win in the end.