Thursday Feb. 9, 2012
Comments on: Hope and the Art of Satire
Let’s be civil.
The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), convict someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail webmaster [at] flatheadbeacon.com.

The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.

By Howie on 04-11-08
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


MY CHOICE …

WITH APOLOGIES TO DR. SEUSS

The pundits, the experts must all disagree
On their choice for the office of presidency.
They simplify issues that must be construed
As having more relevance than red or than blue.

Can Hillary win, or will she concede?
Will she fabricate stories? Is she guilty of greed?
Is her husband Bill, a help in this race
Since he favors free trade and once brought her disgrace?

Can Obama move past this terrible fuss
That caused him to throw grandma under the bus
While keeping his friendship with Reverend Wright
Though Wright seems quite angry at all that is white?

McCain is too old and to broke and to mean.
We cannot vote him into office, it seems.
A hero, for certain, of this all can agree.
But a hundred years in Iraq? Is it necessary?

The pundits, the experts must all disagree
On their choice for the office of presidency.
Their insight is biased, confusing, conjoined*.
I’m much better off just flipping a coin.

*Conjoined: …brought together so as to overlap