Comments on: Rehberg Navigates a Shifting Political Landscape
By Vud on 04-14-10
Denny’s earmarks 2008 - 2010. (With a little help from his friends…)
By Vud on 04-14-10
...http://www.legistorm.com/earmarks/details/member/438/Rep_Dennis_Rehberg/sort/amount/type/desc/year/all/page/7.html
By Kalispell Native on 04-14-10
Poor Denny. Trotting out that tired, and debunked, lie about 16,000 new IRS agents. http://www.factcheck.org/2010/03/irs-expansion/
The empty suit still rides high in the saddle. That is, when he’s not drunk and falling out it.
Harkening back to 1898: Remember the Wayfarers Boat Crash!
By Roark on 04-14-10
Rep. Rehberg had uncountable opp. to stop earmarks, restore liberty, and respect the Constitution.-it’s pathetic that he is only now showing the proper behavior of a statesman who defends or freedom.
By dsrobins on 04-14-10
Denny Rehberg regards himself as a “moderate?” Now that is truly laughable.
By Roark on 04-15-10
If Denny Rehberg is NOT a moderate - he is at home on the left/big government side.
By Vud on 04-16-10
Beacon staff:
Maybe you should call Denny back for another cup of coffee.
Rehberg has sat on the Appropriations committee for some time now.
“When Congress sets the budgets for all the federal agencies every summer, there is no committee busier or more lobbied than House Appropriations. The committee does not just provide funding for lucrative government contracts, but is also famous for inserting last-minute industry-backed provisions riders **blocking regulatory actions** interest groups oppose.”
Since the committee deals with funding for agencies that regulate a variety of interests, members attract donations from a variety of interests including health professionals, defense contractors, and oil and gas companies.
Including:
2007-2008:
* Subcommittee on House Committee on **Financial Services and General Government.**
* Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denny_Rehberg#Committees_and_Affiliations
I know…it’s just the way the game is played.
By Vud on 04-16-10
Oh sure. Why not ?
http://appropriations.house.gov/pdf/FS_FY10_FC_Summary_as_amended_07.07.2009.pdf








The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.