Let’s be civil. The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), convict someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail editor [at] flatheadbeacon.com. The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.
By no derogatory public statements on 01-06-09
So I’ll make a few. The Milhous Group is a bunch of pigs. They do not have the interests of anyone but themselves in their tiny little minds. Florida is filled with these creeps, lots of cash to throw around. They are destroying our heritage here in Montana. Who really needed condos on such an historic site? The Floridians, that’s who.
Beacon Readers Rated This Comment:
By Kalispell Native on 01-06-09
They aren’t condos, they are individual houses. And who said only Floridians would own them?
Beacon Readers Rated This Comment:
By Bigfork resident on 01-07-09
A pig by any other name is still a pig: KLE is comprised of condos NOT SFRs. Though they stand alone the owner does not own the land under the structure.
Beacon Readers Rated This Comment:
By Riverwild on 01-07-09
This is just another example of the sneaky, slimy way the Milhous Group works. They pretend to be cooperative and then stab you in the back. Why should this group be allowed any special consideration? Why permanent docks when the condo owners (so far only one) are definitely not permanent?
Beacon Readers Rated This Comment:
By Monty Sky on 01-12-09
This is typical liberal dog wagging. Using the media to bash a development project in order to get around the rules. You are all just as guilty as you say Milhous is!!
He probably didn’t put in for the variance. Leander or another Swan Laker did, in order to bring more negative attention to the project through posts like these. Small minded people.
Beacon Readers Rated This Comment:
In order to post comments you must register once with the Beacon and be logged in. Log in below or register now.
Hundreds Gather for Hungry Horse Soldier’s Funeral
As Candidate Filing Deadline Passes, Political Season Begins
Hilliard Rises from Practice Squad to NFL Backup
Celebrating the Centennial on Screen
For Valley’s Young Professionals, a Recovery in Fits and Starts
Comments on: Shortly After Legal Settlement, Kootenai Lodge Upsets Neighbors
Let’s be civil. The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), convict someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail editor [at] flatheadbeacon.com. The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.
By no derogatory public statements on 01-06-09
So I’ll make a few. The Milhous Group is a bunch of pigs. They do not have the interests of anyone but themselves in their tiny little minds. Florida is filled with these creeps, lots of cash to throw around. They are destroying our heritage here in Montana. Who really needed condos on such an historic site? The Floridians, that’s who.
By Kalispell Native on 01-06-09
They aren’t condos, they are individual houses. And who said only Floridians would own them?
By Bigfork resident on 01-07-09
A pig by any other name is still a pig: KLE is comprised of condos NOT SFRs. Though they stand alone the owner does not own the land under the structure.
By Riverwild on 01-07-09
This is just another example of the sneaky, slimy way the Milhous Group works. They pretend to be cooperative and then stab you in the back. Why should this group be allowed any special consideration? Why permanent docks when the condo owners (so far only one) are definitely not permanent?
By Monty Sky on 01-12-09
This is typical liberal dog wagging. Using the media to bash a development project in order to get around the rules. You are all just as guilty as you say Milhous is!!
He probably didn’t put in for the variance. Leander or another Swan Laker did, in order to bring more negative attention to the project through posts like these. Small minded people.