Saturday May. 26, 2012
Comments on:
Election 2012
Let’s be civil.
The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), convict someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail webmaster [at] flatheadbeacon.com.

The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.

By Yudamni on 02-08-12
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


I would not trust Tester.  He is supposed to represent Montana.  When over 60% of us were
against Obama Care he still voted for it!  He is Obama’s buddy in my opinion,
By ride4fun on 02-09-12
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


I think this idea would be appreciated by everyone in Montana.  I don’t look forward to having
to watch bunches of negative ads.  Let’s talk issues.  And to “Yudamni”, if you don’t like Obama
and Tester, you get to make that clear when you
vote.  Like all of us do.
By RIGHTOFCENTER on 02-09-12
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


What kind of fool does Jon “Obama Rubber Stamp” Tester think we are.  He’s outraised Rehberg
from out of State Liberal interest groups that brag about Montana being a cheap State to “buy” a
Senate seat in.  If Rehberg feel for this he would be putting himself at a tremendous money
disadvantate, it would be foolish.  We need every tool possible to remove Tester and his far left
liberal agenda. 

We need all the money and help we can get to make sure everyone knows how terrible the
Obama/Tester record has been on jobs, the economy and Montana.  The public has to also be
reminded over and over and over how bad Obamacare/Testercare has been for this country.  So I
say the more money to get out the Tester/Obama record, the better.

Why would Rehberg agree to this and give a liberal like Tester and his out of state far left
supporters a money advantage to buy the Montana Senate seat?
By Craig moore on 02-09-12
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


Tester is treating us to the “pee under the shell” con game.  He doesn’t want anyone to focus on
who he owns his soul to.  IN this election cycle Tester has taken more lobbyist cash than any
other member of congress.  Also, he has spent much campaign time raising out-of-state funds in
New York, California, and K Street.  Just look at his totals:
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/geog.php?cycle=2012&cid=N00027605&type=I 30% in-state
70% out-of-state.  Then look at his PAC money.

Tester know people are capable of turning off commercials.  What he should be worrying about is
people holding him to his ethics pledge and demanding that he forego selling his soul to
lobbyists, PAC’s, and out-of-state contributors.
By Craig moore on 02-09-12
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:


correction:  s/b be owes, not owns.