Wednesday Jun. 19, 2013
Comments on:
Guest column
Let’s be civil.
The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), accuse someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail webmaster [at] flatheadbeacon.com.

The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.

  Newest First
By bocephusj57 on 05-11-12 @ 2:13 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


There’s this pesky little complication called the First Amendment you seem to be forgetting
about.  It’s gonna be impossible to have an amendment allowing for government repression of
speech when that is what the First Amendment prohibits.

But, if we could outlaw wearing flag-motif clothing, that would be fine because it would really
upset the rightwingnut fauxtriots.  But, the First Amendment rears its pesky little head there too.

There is nothing sacred about the flag.  To use the word ‘sacred’ is to imply a religious
significance.  There is no religious connotation conferred upon it, except as a contrivance by
the god-botherers.
By Dmitry on 05-11-12 @ 4:36 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


Things are looking up in on-line commenting. Hankie is right that the best end to every USA flag
is in flames, and bocephusj57 is perfectly correct when he hints that the freedoms the flag
represents might just be important. If there is no freedom to symbolize, and if the flag cannot
be afforded some dignity, it isn’t worth protecting. The letter’s author, Mr. Palmer, makes a
good point that it’s a shame people don’t respect the flag. It is a shame. So shame on them. And
may they be free to be that way. And we may be free to shame them. But taking freedoms away is
no way to set a positive example for freedom. So, shame on all those freedom-disrespecting
jerks; and double shame on all those freedom-disrespecting jerks as well. Burn a flag if you’re
a patriot, burn it in effigy if you’re a jerk. Frown about it if you want, but don’t “there
oughta be a law” around me.
By Dmitry on 05-11-12 @ 5:02 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


Aw, shucks. In the first instance of “freedom-disrespecting” I meant “flag-disrespecting”.
By bopho on 05-11-12 @ 9:29 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


What is flag desecration anyway?  It’s is probably in the eyes of the beholder. If you walked into
somebody’s house and saw that they were using a flag as a table cloth, are they desecrating the
flag?  Well here is a photo that I have always liked.  The President of the United States and the
General of the Army of the Potomac using a flag as a table cloth!  Send in the flag police. 
http://jobokon.com/flag
By T73 on 05-12-12 @ 6:53 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


Searching Google news, I don’t see thousands of unAmericans ravaging flag poles and burning our
great American symbol.  It doesn’t appear to be a problem.  There are plenty of instances from
other countries but not in the US.  On the rare occasion where it makes the news, it usually
ends with “...was charged and fined $XXX and given a suspended sentence.”  Laws already exist to
protect the flag.

To me, the flag is a proud symbol of America which is defined by the US Constitution.  I would
be very reluctant to change something as vital as the Constitution to protect a symbol.  I don’t
see wisdom in that but I do see potential danger.

The last great wave of flag burning I remember was during the Vietnam War protests.  I didn’t
like the war and I didn’t like the flag burning but the Constitution was not damaged Protesters
were obviously exercising their Freedom of Speech and while chilling, it did far less damage
than rocks thrown by rioters. 

I prefer existing laws defend America’s flag.  The flag will be just fine.  More important, I
want our Senators and Representatives to defend and uphold the U.S. Constitution.
By mooseberryinn on 05-13-12 @ 8:45 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


Liberals will always raise the “freedom of speech” issue if it serves their purpose.  Otherwise…not so
much.
By montanaeasy56 on 05-14-12 @ 7:02 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


Back in the day when the flag was the honored symbol of this country, people had great
respect for the flag. Back when this contry was first started and after the two world wars,
people were proud to fly our “symbol” of how great this nation was. Now, we spend all our
money on foreign products, allow American companies to take American jobs overseas for that
almighty profit. Maybe it would be more fitting to change our flag to one that better represents
America nowadays…maybe one that looks like the almighty dollar..that is what we worship in
this country anymore…at any cost.
By T73 on 05-14-12 @ 7:06 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


I’m not liberal.  I’m very independent.
If conservatives don’t value Freedom of Speech, I’m certainly not one of those, either.  There
is a reason the Founding Fathers made Freedom of Speech the 1st Amendment. 
The problem for some people is that, in order for the 1st Amendment to work properly, not only
do you have to use it but you also have to give it to those you disagree with.  Welcome to America.
By ICallB.S. on 05-14-12 @ 5:15 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


There will be no flag protection amendment.  Guaranteed.  Btw, I have a flag that has been
replaced with a new one as it has gotten damaged and faded.  What do I do with the old one? 
Can I burn it in my outdoor fire pit?
By bocephusj57 on 05-14-12 @ 8:39 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


I will refer you to the info and the link in Hankie’s first comment.  If you feel you can abide
by that process appropriately as a DIY effort, go for it.

Or, contact a Post officer at your nearest VFW (American Legion?) and see if they will accept it
for proper disposal.
By Gabby Johnson on 05-17-12 @ 6:54 am
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


With respect to Gunny Palmer for his service to our country, I beg to disagree with his call for
a Constitutional amendment because I agree with the Supreme Court decision that First Amendment
free speech protections should not be curtailed because of rare, despicable cases of flag burning.
Whenever I see film of angry mobs in places like Pakistan burning our flag, I am reminded that
we enjoy freedoms that those people will never know.
Note: The headline should read “some veterans support amendment to protect flag”  because some
other veterans served to protect free speech and the opinions of veterans on the issue are not
universal.
By STVFB on 05-18-12 @ 1:05 pm
READERS RATED THIS COMMENT:
0 up | 0 down


I don’t agree with Tester on much, but I agree on this issue.  Like it or not, flag burning is 1st
amendment protected speech.  If that offends you too bad. 

The bottom line is this:  the constitution would not have been ratified without the first 10
amendments.  Without the Bill of Rights there is no Constitution.  Any attempt to remove or weaken
any part of it will void the entire compact.  That is not a road you want to go down.
  • KGB, Meet NSA
    bocephusj57 said: "Some Americans want more than small rifle primers. http://www.timesunion.com ALBANY, N.Y. — An industrial mechanic with General Electric Co., who is also allegedly a member…
  • PSC Chairman Fighting Cancer
    waterman said: "Please, tell me how the gubmint pays for his health insurance ? Didn’t you really mean less than 50% of working class, or taxpayers, paid…
  • PSC Chairman Fighting Cancer
    bocephusj57 said: "I hope he has a successful surgery and recovery, courtesy of his gubmint paid health insurance."
  • CBO: 8 Million to Gain Legal Status in Senate Bill
    GATE said: "The Deceiver’s been on vacation for 4 1/2 years!  If we could get him to pitch a tent on the Rio Grande with some night-vision…
  • CBO: 8 Million to Gain Legal Status in Senate Bill
    bocephusj57 said: "Mixing apples and oranges doesn’t make your bald-faced lie any less of a lie. Shall we talk about Shrubya’s 277 vacations (at $500,000 minimum per…
 
Kellyn Brown
Kellyn Brown2h
@kellynbrown
RT @tristanscott: Big news for Whitefish's Haskill Basin. More to come in next week's @FlatheadBeacon http://t.co/E2YzS46DAO
Dillon Tabish
Dillon Tabish17 Jun
@djtabish
More tragic news from the roads - Whitefish Woman Killed in Highway 93 Crash http://t.co/Khb4GdBpGi That's 12 deaths last weekend
Molly Priddy
Molly Priddy46m
@mollypriddy
@EmilieRSaunders @jennacederberg Don't worry, Em, I'm '03 so there are plenty of cool women in that graduating class too. #you #me #duh
Myers Reece
Myers Reece31 May
@myersreece
Oh, thanks! RT @jessicalowry: #FF to the talented @MyersReece. If you like writing, great stories, and nice people you should follow.
Flathead Beacon
FB Headlines50m
@flatheadbeacon
Hot Springs Woman Denies Kidnapping Charge http://t.co/KX5R6q75zZ