Wednesday Apr. 23, 2014
Comments on:
President Obama delivers his first State of the Union since being reelected.
Let’s be civil.
The Flathead Beacon encourages vigorous discussion and lively debate, but we will delete comments that attack other readers, make accusations we can’t verify, stray too far off topic, criticize local businesses (call them if you have a problem), accuse someone of a crime, use profanity or are simply judged to be in bad taste. We don’t always have someone moderating comments, so we ask for your help: If you see a comment that violates these ground rules, or you simply deem it offensive, please e-mail webmaster [at]

The views expressed in the comments section do not reflect those of the Beacon.

  Oldest First
By mooseberryinn on 02-19-13 @ 7:15 am
3 up | 7 down

Hmm, aside from the drooling liberal posts, the very first paragraph of the article’s author says it all. 
“Uncompromising and politically emboldened”  Golly, just like Hugo Chavez, no compromise.  OK then,
seeing as how everything this “president” has attempted has failed or cost billions for no good results,
I’d say it’s pretty smart that Republicans and Independents don’t back Chairman Obama’s “plans” for
the “transformation”.
By Mark W. on 02-19-13 @ 1:11 am
3 up | 6 down

It must be very strange to you redhawk, this place outside your head called rightside-up land, where
the kids don’t get candies for being naughty.
By redhawk on 02-19-13 @ 12:23 am
6 up | 2 down

Wow.  so a return to religious strangleholds would make you decide to be rational? That’s just
downright creepy.
By Mark W. on 02-18-13 @ 6:59 pm
2 up | 3 down

Here you go, reggie and pik, since we’re trading books and trying to figure out who the real pawns are:
By Mark W. on 02-18-13 @ 5:43 pm
2 up | 6 down

I’m on record as supporting a quid pro quo.  For every concession the left makes on social
conservatism, I’m happy to make concessions on financial liberalism.

For example, if the left would support a return to state’s rights on the legality of abortion, I wouldn’t
fight their desire for higher taxation on the wealthy.  Same goes for prayer in school—give a little,
get a little.  Controls on Hollywood, return to earlier First Amendment restrictions on pornography
and laws restricting divorce are also bargaining chips. 

We fix the tragedy of the metaphysical commons first, then when we work on fairer wealth
distribution we aren’t throwing money down a black hole. 

It’s not as if there aren’t solutions.
By Fast on 02-18-13 @ 4:59 pm
1 up | 5 down

When is the Mother ship arriving? Gee I hope that it wasn’t that fire in the sky over Russia.
By pik20e4me on 02-18-13 @ 4:29 pm
5 up | 4 down

Thanks, Reggie—I saw a review of that book and it promises to add to our knowledge.

Thanks, GATE—Who said any of this was intellectual?  If the Baltimore Sun story is correct,
and $585,000 was spent figuring out how to save money, that may be a pretty good investment
if the end result is saving $20 million or so.  I’d be happy for the Pentagon to spend a couple
million the same way if they ended up saving a couple billion.

By GATE on 02-18-13 @ 4:15 pm
4 up | 5 down

Slinging intellectual mud at each other aside, here, in a nutshell is what happens when you give out-of-
control government on all levels a blank checkbook:  From the Baltimore Sun: ’ City Spends
$585,000.00 on study of how to save money’!!!!!!
By reggie on 02-18-13 @ 4:14 pm
6 up | 3 down

To understand how corporations reinvented conservatism into the current political monster, a
great source of information is; “Invisable Hands: The Making of the Conservative Movement
from the New Deal to Reagan”. A recent release by Kim Phillips-Fein.

This (basically history) book is well researched and documented and reveals the huge money
machine behind the current effort to return to the guilded age of 1929. Where extravagant
decadence for the “deserving” and crushing poverty for the rest is the intended result.
By pik20e4me on 02-18-13 @ 4:10 pm
5 up | 3 down

Not worthy of a response that time, MBI.  How about a substantive argument next post?
By terryt on 02-18-13 @ 4:02 pm
2 up | 2 down

Any b notice when you give a thumbs up or down it adds to both counts?
By mooseberryinn on 02-18-13 @ 2:52 pm
4 up | 10 down

Hmmm, let’s see now.  Y’all got disappointed with what the Republicans allegedly did, so it must be
time to give support to the communists?  This is a bad choice.  Kind of like helping the destruction of
America so everybody can be disappointed (to the max.)  Well, enjoy the fruits of your labor as we all
pay the price for so many just like you.
By pik20e4me on 02-18-13 @ 12:22 pm
10 up | 4 down

Mark, I have no zeal in reporting that we are being outpaced.  As you surely know, Asian have
strong family groups and push their offspring to get good educations.  This goes back to one of
your earlier premises. If we are being outpaced, how as a society do we change that?  I don’t
pretend to have an answer, but I can’t ignore the reality.

You misconstrue one of my arguments.  I will stand by my assertion that ALL of us have been
duped in the interest of big money.  Read Naomi Klein.  The right wing and the Tea Party have
no monopoly on common sense, by the way.

You’re disgusted by my camp?  By what presumption do you think you know it intimately? 
That is a straw-man technique currently abused by many of the posters here:  because you
disagree with me, you must be a liberal.  And liberals are swine. 

Yes, I am to the left of Todd Akin and the Fox News team.  I stopped voting Republican for the
time being when President Bush sent me a $300 check so he could justify giving millions of tax
breaks to the wealthy, put two unfunded wars on the credit card, then set up a drug program
that doesn’t even allow the government to negotiate prices.  Senator McCain choosing Sarah
Palin put a cap on it for me.

I hope it is a temporary affliction, but I can’t give much respect to the denial of science, vaginal
probes, legitimate rape, and other dumb on the right wing at this time.  Even Bobby Jindahl
said they can’t continue being “the stupid party.”  I’m a jilted conservative, if you want a label. 
Read Andrew Sullivan; he pretty much speaks for me these days.
As for the safety net, the blue states currently send more tax money to the red states—many of
whose citizens are hurting.  If we discontinue that help, explain to me how you wish to pick up
the slack locally.  For example, I see a lot of “tip jars” at checkout stands.  I doubt that many of
them get enough money to cover a $50,000 cancer treatment.  What policies do you suggest
changing or implementing to deal with this?

I obviously am not going to inspire you, nor is it my intent.  I respect your politics, even though I
may wish to disabuse you of some of your ideas.  You must be disgusted by 80% of the
population.  We clearly have different perspectives; there is a chance you could learn
something from me.  But disgust?  Aren’t you ashamed?  If I had posted that, I’d be
By Mark W. on 02-18-13 @ 10:58 am
3 up | 10 down

So these are the arguments you’ve chosen to inspire me:

The Republican base has realized the Republican establishment has done nothing to curb liberal
hegemony over the last 80 years.  I don’t understand what you want me to take from this.

Asians and others are outpacing our domestic crop.  Your caring nature really comes through in the
zeal with which you report this.

I think the safety net is abused and inefficient and I’d like to see a return to greater local charity. 
Conservatives recognize that smaller government means a larger responsibility to take care of
each other.  You can’t have one without the other. 

I know your camp intimately, and I can’t begin to explain to you how much it disgusts me.  But I’m
still here to be inspired.  And I’m still waiting.
By pik20e4me on 02-18-13 @ 10:35 am
7 up | 4 down

I loved Iceland when I was there.  You are absolutely right that they avoided the shock doctrine-
-the astringent policies foisted on other countries by the IMF,World Bank, and the Chicago
School of economics.  They didn’t suck up to their bankers, for one thing.

I don’t know if you have been paying attention lately, but Republicans are getting pretty good
at turning against each other.  For that, I wouldn’t blame liberals.

Don’t look now, but many of the “foreign people” flooding our nation are leaving our dometic
crop in the dust—Asiastics, for example, are now quite successful, dominating many of our
places of higher education.

Mark, you truly don’t know my camp.

Did you have any thoughts on the current state of the safety net?
By Mark W. on 02-18-13 @ 10:13 am
4 up | 9 down

What’s the one nation that managed to shake off the shock doctrine?  Iceland.  A small,
homogenous nation with a culture they can take pride in separate and before government. 

If Iceland had a lovely left wing like we do here, that managed to convict the Icelandic people of
genocide, Holocaust, misogyny, slave ownership and greed, and managed to smash their
traditional values under a rubric of separation of church and state, and then flooded their nation with
foreign peoples, do you think they’d have been successful in protecting themselves, or do you think
they’d be too turned against each other by then to act with a collective will? 

And you have the unmitigated gall to say that the poor people who haven’t had the last lick of
common sense educated out of them have actually been miseducated by Dark Forces to not know
what is good for them. 

And this is supposed to inspire me to join your camp?
By GATE on 02-18-13 @ 10:09 am
9 up | 10 down

If, from the more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those which are in an advanced stage of
improvement, we still find the greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of
industry, and grasping the spoil of the multitude. Invention is continually exercised, to furnish new
pretenses for revenue and taxation. It watches prosperity as its prey and permits none to escape
without tribute.”  -Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1791.
By mooseberryinn on 02-18-13 @ 9:47 am
8 up | 16 down

“Inability to compromise” seems to be a Hallmark of the King Obama dynasty.  Ranks right up there
with his threats to “replace” and/or otherwise circumvent our Constitution.  Or maybe you weren’t aware
of that in his regime reported speeches?
By pik20e4me on 02-18-13 @ 8:59 am
12 up | 9 down

No, Mark, I don’t believe that.  On the contrary, I believe that many people in the position you
describe support the Tea Party.  They are as frustrated as the rest of us.  Yet I believe that
many (Tea Party and otherwise) are unwitting tools, manipulated by big money, and actually
end up voting against their own interests.  Read The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein if you
want your eyes opened about how mulitinationals and government policies throughout the
world have shafted us in their race to consolidate ownership of all resources that come from
the earth into the hands of a few.  That book is the most profound game-changer in my thinking
in the last decade regarding capitalism and free-market purity.

The difficulty faced by the Tea Party, as its popularity has diminished since the election (I
heard 8-10% support it now), is its “my way or the highway” inability to compromise. 
Ideological purity is fine, but nothing—good or bad—gets done without compromise with the
majority of the population.  I could add that a certain imperviousness to facts is another
problem, but that is just my personal observation.

Regarding my last post, if you want to see an example of communities of similar-thinking
people, check out any of the Del Webb Sun Cities!  Don’t park on the streets or leave your
garage door open there.  Mr. Crowder’s heart might not take it.

Did you have any thoughts on the current state of the safety net?
By mooseberryinn on 02-18-13 @ 8:18 am
5 up | 9 down

Ha!  Hilarious stuff.  just cracks me up to read the term “closed minds” from the liberals.  here is a trivia
question for ya - what major “main stream news” channel mentioned Marco Rubio’s taking a sip of
water over 150 times in the past week?  this is “news”?
By Mark W. on 02-17-13 @ 6:30 pm
5 up | 5 down

Is it your position that there are no people who are struggling or who are one medical condition away
from bankruptcy in the Tea Party?
By pik20e4me on 02-17-13 @ 6:13 pm
10 up | 8 down

Actually, Mark, your wish for a Tea Party community may be fulfilled.  In Northern Idaho, a
group of like-minded individuals are trying to build Citadel, a walled community (see  Here’s a quote regarding them:

“Imagine living in a community where you know that residing in every single home in the
neighborhood are people who think much as do you, respect most of the values as do you, and
will not try to force any of their values on you or your children,” another post from October on
The Citadel’s blog, this one written by someone with the pseudonym Just a III Guy,
reads. “Imagine living in a neighborhood where you know every single neighbor on your street,
in your neighborhood, and in the entire town, has qualified Riflemen inside, ready to come to
your aid at a moment’s notice, whether to help you change a tire, fix a problem, or cover your
back in a firefight with an Enemy of Liberty.”

The other option is Glenn Beck’s theme park:  Independence, USA.  This will be a lot like
Citadel, except the theme park component will be an area where liberals can view patriots in
their natural habitat.

At Citadel, anyone entering the town square must be carrying, and all residents must qualify
annually on the firing range after they reach age 13.

I encourage you to look into both these options.  However, do it with your eyes open; the
mainstream media said that they may be scams.  Not that the MSM are trustworthy.  At Glenn
Beck’s place, you will probably need to buy a lot of gold coins; I think he expects to mint his
own currency.

You did ask me a lot of questions.  I believe in helping those who are willing to help
themselves.  I lend a helping hand, even with one of my renters who is nearly a year behind. 
That makes me a taker in your eyes?  They got behind once before and worked over the years
to pay me back. I don’t know what spirit has to do with it in this instance:  America for me is not
a zero-sum game.  If we figure out how to make it better for all of our citizens, everyone wins in
the end. 

You tend to disparage those who think differently from you, assigning motives to them that may
have no basis in reality.  I can count on one hand the number of people I know who
think “being owed something is an effective way to live your life.”  You don’t necessarily have
the upper hand.

Recent studies show that vertical mobility in this country is actually less than in many other
developed countries.  We should all be Lone Rangers?  Or maybe we can quit looking at
others who are struggling like they are somehow deficient? That maybe because they are
hurting they are takers rolling in their extravagant safety net?  Most of our citizens are about
one medical issue from bankruptcy. Explain to me how this is good.  How about you go first
and try to convince me this time?

Pop a beer for me this evening.
By Mark W. on 02-17-13 @ 4:43 pm
7 up | 13 down

reggie, I think you’d have to try very hard to screw up a country this bad.  I think if things fell apart
tomorrow, we would come together and create a better world and would cry like babies when big
daddy DC Govco landed Air Force One to tell us that vacation was over.  I think a group of Tea
Party people could take a barren piece of land and in little time create a country that the rest of the
world would be banging down the doors to enter.  And even if all your facts would tell me otherwise,
it wouldn’t convince me it wasn’t worth trying.  Why would you want to talk a people out of that kind
of spirit?  There are people who live by bread and there are people who live by spirit.  America is for
the latter.
By reggie on 02-17-13 @ 4:06 pm
13 up | 11 down

Don’t tax protesters feel they are “owed” more of the wealth they create? In fact isn’t that one of
your main complaints against government…funding it? Are you happy working twice the hours
to buy virtually everything than you had to work to buy the same product a few decades ago?

If you are happy with continually falling standard of liveing and the related associated suffering
this causes for nearly everybody around you, then no I can’t help you see any farther.

My comments on this thread are intended to cause rethinking of reality and the reason for
current terrible trouble befalling most of us citizens. I believe many have been convinced to put
their energy in the wrong direction (tea party especially) in this most patriototic fight to save
everything the U.S. stands for.

However, haveing been wrong in the past, I am open to being enlightened. Insults, taunts, lies,
threats….etc. are unconvinceing, so we on the left await reasoned, thoughtfull argument in any
attempt at persuation.

I regard as true the old Chinese proverb “the roots of belief are always green”, do you?
By Mark W. on 02-17-13 @ 3:22 pm
8 up | 12 down

Furthermore, no matter how many facts and how much data you and reggie produce, the bottom
line is that there will always be people who will reject the philosophy that being owed something is
an effective way to live your life. 

So perhaps you could address that.  How does it help my life to go day to day with the belief that
I’m owed something I’m not getting?  How does that philosophy lead to personal fulfillment?  How
do I know when I’m no longer owed anything?  Won’t there always be something more that I am
By Mark W. on 02-17-13 @ 2:59 pm
5 up | 16 down

“The habitat of Christians is the habitat of closed minds.”

Remember pik, it’s the Progressive dictionary.


By pik20e4me on 02-17-13 @ 2:49 pm
14 up | 11 down

Mark, from your comment, I can only confer that the habitat of Christians is the habitat of
closed minds?  I don’t think that was what you had in mind.

Gate, I’m sorry my last comment was snarky.  I get exasperated when posters here and
elsewhere only bring forth the following argument:  “That ain’t so because it interferes with my
ideology.”  You assert that reggie’s commentary was pulled out of his nether regions.  I’d like to
see you tell us that you disagree, and then provide a compelling argument, with references of
substance, that explain why.

Reggie’s commentary can be substantiated by citing many sources far more influential than
you and me.  I believe he has the horsepower to do so.  If he needs help, I’m willing to support
him.  I’ll type with one hand if you like.  In short, don’t tell us you disagree by mocking him.  Tell
us WHY you disagree.  We can start a dialogue.  That way, all of us my have a shot at learning

Have a good one, okay?
By Mark W. on 02-17-13 @ 1:57 pm
6 up | 15 down

Progressive Glossary:

Low Information Voter—someone who votes out of something other than a “gibsmedat” mentality

Bright and Sunny Universe—a place without Christians
By pik20e4me on 02-17-13 @ 1:13 pm
17 up | 13 down

Gate, I am deeply saddened that you are so challenged by facts.  Step out of the hive mind
that has been created by Fox News and its minions for a while.  There is a bright and sunny
universe outside for those without closed minds.
By GATE on 02-17-13 @ 11:15 am
13 up | 18 down

Where do you come up with this stuff? If they ever bring back ‘Outer Limits’ as a TV mini-series you
have my vote as the lead writer!
By reggie on 02-17-13 @ 10:39 am
21 up | 15 down

How can you on the right ignore all evidence and stubbornly hold on to proven failed policy and
theory? We currently have the lowest taxes on the wealthy in generations and the lowest taxes
on corporations in memory. Business is hording trillions of cash and the wealthy hold the most
wealth and income in national history. Yet, NOTHING predicted by supply side economic
theory has happened, only creation of effective Plutrocracy instead of representative

Are you still “giveing it a chance” or is it just refusal to admit error? The public has figured it out,
in spite of our media continually praising the exploiters and ignoreing the devastation
these “Atlas” class thieves have made of the U.S.

I believe we are much better served with both parties working for the people. But the right has
become a cult of denial and service to a tiny, wealthy minority at the expense of the vast
majority (including probably everyone posting here, and almost everyone we all have ever
met)..... Don’t you want to be part of a prosperous nation again?

Unless you change enough to at least again fool more low information voters, you may lose the
house in 2014; despite the successfull gerrymandering which gave you the unearned control
that you still so flagrently abuse.
By mooseberryinn on 02-16-13 @ 9:34 pm
10 up | 22 down

1. “progressive” taxes targeting the rich, result in minor revenue increases, major investment
decreases.  2.  As the ‘progressive” taxes are learned and circumvented,  more and more money
leaves the market place.  This results in slower growth and decreased employment.  3.  As less
revenue is taken from the “rich”, the very definition of “rich” moves downward.  This results in people
previously not defined as “rich” becoming targets of the downward sliding scale of who to tax more.
4.  When the downward scale reaches the point where revenues received are still not enough,
everyone’s taxes increase even more.  Note recent calls from Chairman Obama for tax increases. 
By GATE on 02-16-13 @ 2:05 pm
12 up | 17 down

Reggie: You may find this of interest: TAX-DODGING: It’s a $20Trillion Global Industry and it starts
right .
By reggie on 02-16-13 @ 1:20 pm
14 up | 12 down

Restribution of wealth in the U.S. continues on it’s 35 year trajectory…..from the many to the
By pik20e4me on 02-16-13 @ 10:41 am
21 up | 10 down

Mark, if you were responding to me, I was not advocating for redistributive schemes.  For
certain, you are right about one thing:  The money goes up, up, up and away.  Right now, the
game is rigged by the top 5-10%, for the top 5-10%.  As Warren Buffett said, we have class
warfare, and my class won.

The monied class is doing just fine.  There is no need to advocate to further advance their
causes any more.  Maybe we can push for some help at our end of the table. If that is
redistritibution,sign me up, please.

By Mark W. on 02-16-13 @ 10:28 am
9 up | 19 down

For every redistributive scheme the government takes a cut and the banks take a cut.  That’s the
whole point of communism—to send the money upwards.  The money goes up, up, up and away.

Keep asking for more for US.  Guaranteed you’ll get it.  Good and hard. 
By pik20e4me on 02-16-13 @ 10:02 am
19 up | 12 down

Most of the reviews of Senator Rubio’s response suggest that he needs a bit of work before he
is Rushmore Ready.

While many here are concerned about the possibility of tax rate changes for the wealthy, this is
worth digesting:

Top 10% of American’s now take 46.5% of nation’s income, highest level since 1917.  Bottom
90% have 53.5%. #labor

Instead of being tools of the Koch brothers’ agenda, it may be worth us bottom 90% supporting
and advocating for policies that can help US.
By mooseberryinn on 02-14-13 @ 9:01 am
10 up | 29 down

If you will notice - the regime media hasn’t said much by way of evaluating Chairman Obama’s “wish
list” for spending.  The regime media fails any mention of King Obama’s election promises vs his
present call for raising taxes. etc.  The regime media makes no effort to evaluate Rubio’s speech
beyond mentioning (numerous times) his taking a drink of water.  Ya think the regime media is
exhibiting a wee bit of bias?  Nah, maybe they’re just down wind of the anointed one’s pot smoking?
By mooseberryinn on 02-13-13 @ 10:32 pm
13 up | 33 down

Well golly, glad to see so many truly understand the obama disaster.  yes indeedy, the worst
“president” ever inflicted upon America.  the worst disaster since the Civil War, the most lacking in
integrity etc. etc. etc. and yet…. the “gimme” folks still kneel in the bs to worship him.  Amazing.
By Montanadan on 02-13-13 @ 5:07 pm
18 up | 39 down

Do you think anyone in LaLa Land DC nows what a Trillion dollars is ? 1000 dollar bills stacked 67.9
mile’s high, cant even fathem what 16.4 Trillion going on 24 trillion at Obama’s ending term. We
borrow 46 cents on every dollar. These crooks must be on the worse drugs ever. Corruption and
never ending power. If they won’t pass a balanced budget in the Constitution then you will know who
to throw out. Make them have the same benefits as the rest of us if not then throw them out. Fact
check his speech it was all lies.  America what do you expect he want’s to bankrupt America it’s in
his game plan, Saul Alinski’s Rules for Radicals, he taught this in his Law class in Chicago. Grand
parents and Parents was Communists, his mentor Frank Marshall Davis was a card carrying
Commie. If only America vetted him in 2007-08. America may of had a chance ? Get educated.
Probably to late. Pray for America.
By pik20e4me on 02-13-13 @ 5:01 pm
32 up | 24 down

I believe that everyone of any politcal tribe or persuasion can agree that in one respect
President Obama’s speech was drier than Senator Rubio’s response.
By GATE on 02-13-13 @ 3:57 pm
23 up | 38 down

While American’s had to endure their 4th annual 2 hour Colonoscopy last night, not one word about the
3,000 souls being added to the Food Stamp program every day, the 3 Trillion Dollars in unfunded State
pension funds, the Five consecutive years in a row of the worst economic growth since the Great
Depression, half of Americans on the edge of financial ruin, 3 Million fewer Americans employed today
than in January 2008….............and on…and on..
By Mark W. on 02-13-13 @ 2:45 pm
14 up | 34 down

The Zombie applause is always a dead giveaway.
By Mark W. on 02-13-13 @ 2:38 pm
13 up | 33 down

That’s funny, I could have sworn I was watching a cult debriefing appointment last night.
By pik20e4me on 02-13-13 @ 11:40 am
45 up | 22 down

Does anyone else believe that some of the posters here are late fo their cult debriefing
By GATE on 02-13-13 @ 9:08 am
23 up | 46 down

If the alphabet channels had any dignity they’d run this kind of dribble at 3 am with the rest of the
By hotfishmt on 02-13-13 @ 9:06 am
29 up | 5 down

Some stuff can be done: like stop stupid over cost government programs, like the one on last
nights news….where a “inflated” air ship is built & inside a large hanger…..500 million to build
for the US Army….all on speculation of its use as a heavy lift “airship”.
Add in the cost of Afghan & give aways “help” programs for foreign countries like Haiti, help the
starving people of Africa….which has been going on since the mid 50’s (no end to kids or
handout), like the programs to change Medicare….when it should be Medicaid changes to non
working freebees handed out willy nilly to millions of reproducing lazy big city people that
abuse the system.
Add in the elected officials in Washington an their cozy salaries & health benefits along with
their “snazzy private retirement” outside Social Security and are only required to work 3 days a
week, along with endless PORK BARREL PROJECTS…..the #1 thing I would have liked to
hear & did not would be some kind of rein/control on the PBP.
No matter who is President…the Pork Barrel stuff is killing most all federal
budgets….meanwhile, I am off to a big box store to buy some stuff made in China so I can help
the local economy…
By fcb on 02-13-13 @ 8:42 am
19 up | 38 down

Do Nothing Senate : No proposed budget in four years.

Printing Trillions $$$ to bailout European Banks and other Cronies.

National debt worse in 4 years than the previous 200 years.
By GATE on 02-13-13 @ 7:43 am
29 up | 50 down

In his 4th annual ‘State of Confusion’ speech Captain Queeg a.k.a The Deceiver gave a whole new
meaning to the word ‘Whopper’. With the ghost of ‘Ponzi’ in the background and Bernie Madoff cheering
him on from his cell, another ‘canned’ teleprompter speech from the worst President in American
History. A very painful English version of a speech you’d expect from Lenin, Castro or Hugo!
By MontanaTrace on 02-13-13 @ 7:23 am
16 up | 30 down

Sound bites. I was not pleased. It’s going to get expensive.
By mooseberryinn on 02-13-13 @ 7:12 am
23 up | 52 down

bo - didn’t listen or comprehend King Obama’s wish list at all eh?  He should have added (after each
wish list item) - “and you get to pay for it!”  ya just gotta laugh.  Marco made Obama truly ‘transparent”. 
the King merely changed the word ‘spending” to “investment”.  Oh sorry, you didn’t get that did ya.  too
bad, obviously one of the low-info folks.
By bocephusj57 on 02-12-13 @ 11:02 pm
48 up | 28 down

I should say something nice about his presentation of his shopping list of straw man whiny

Marco never took his eyes off of his teleprompter.  Muy bueno!
By bocephusj57 on 02-12-13 @ 10:23 pm
51 up | 32 down

Marco Rubio went from being labeled “The Republican Saviour?” on the cover of Time magazine to
being a cottonmouthed spokesperson for Poland Springs water in 5 days.

It’s generally true about people, when they are lying their tushie off, they get real thirsty.
Obama didn’t take a sip during his entire speech. Marco Romney lunged for his sippy cup after 5
minutes.  Not to mention Mitt Rubio’s obvious flop-sweat through-out his speech.

BTW, I didn’t see Ayn Rand Paul’s tea bagger gibberish being broadcast anywhere, what’s up with
that?  Is there a youtube of it, filed under Aqua Buddha or something?
Kellyn Brown
Kellyn Brown17h
Flathead County may allow political signs to be posted forever No more time restraints
Dillon Tabish
Dillon Tabish8h
Kalispell Annexes 40 Acres Where Rail Park Could Surface
Molly Priddy
Molly Priddy8h
@Lubchansky Where are you on this pain scale?
Tristan Scott
Tristan Scott19 Apr
The Replacements just played with Billy Joe accompaniment! And played an encore! #Coachella2014
Flathead Beacon
FB Headlines8h
Kalispell Annexes 40 Acres Where Rail Park Could Surface