Flathead Valley Real Estate Blog

Sellers, Get an Inspection Before you List!

By Chris Fraser, 12-05-07

In real estate one usually believes that there are things buyers do and things sellers should do, and that’s how the process works. And yes, there are long lists of items which need to be covered by buyers and sellers separately, however here is one item, which as a seller, may make your house stand out to an interested buyer.

Getting your property inspected before your house goes on the market, really is a smart thing to do. The reason buyers get properties inspected is because they want an inventory of what they are buying. This same reasoning applies to sellers. Most purchase contracts fall out do to financing conditions or unforeseen property inspection issues. If you can mitigate the inspection before you list, you as the seller, have all of the information.

Just say for example, Mr. Seller puts his older, Kalispell house on the market for $199,900. A buyer is found, and offers $192,500, contingent upon getting the house inspected. A certified home inspector finds that there is an issue with a water leak under the house, and there is older electrical wiring in the attic. Bids from contractors come back at $1500.00 in repairs. Mr. Buyer is willing to move forward and purchase the house, if the seller makes the repairs by licensed contractors, reduces the price or gives the buyer some type of $1500.00 concession. Mr. Seller is already at his bottom line, didn’t foresee these new problems, which in some way have to be resolved, in order to keep the deal alive. If the issues cannot be resolved, the qualified buyer may walk away, and Mr. Seller will have to disclose these new items in an updated property disclosure statement for other potential buyers.

However, if before listing his house, Mr. Seller contacted his realtor and asked for a list of recommend home inspectors, and paid the fee for a home inspection; Mr. Seller would have had these problems identified. He now has the choice of fixing and repairing the problems, or just getting bids for costs. Mr. Seller will most likely recoup the money when pricing and negotiating his sales price, because he now has all the information. In fact, selling an older home can be a challenge in today’s “new is everything” market-place. Whatever you can do to set your property apart from the competition, will only help you. When I show buyers older homes, I know first hand how valuable it is to say, well the homeowner just had the property inspected, there were a few issues, but here are the receipts of the completed work, and the contractors who performed the work. Usually, the buyer says, wow, this seller is ready to sell!

The other issue at hand here is disclosure. Many buyers are very savvy about disclosure. If you have the property inspected before you list, you now have evidence that you have had an inventory of the property and can now include the inspection to your property disclosure statement, potentially keeping yourself out of trouble. [End of article]
Comment By Crystal L. Cox, 1-02-08

Sellers – Will Getting an inspection Before you List Help your Real Estate for Sale to Stand Out ?

If you wish to use an inspection to fix or to disclose problems, than I say yes get an inspection before you list. However, I don’t think an inspection will really give you a marketing advantage.  It is Legally best for all parties, if a Buyer gets their own inspection.  A buyer may feel you have hired an inspection yourself in order to hide something.  And using an inspection in marketing may just backfire on you. 

Also getting Bids ahead of time for known problems can lead to future problems.  The buyer may use your bid in order to plan financially.  But what if they use the Contractor that you got the bid from and they do a Bad Job.  Who is liable for this?

I would use extreme caution on this.

Also I have NEVER had faith in home inspections.  Yes, they can point out major problems but in my experience they want to get paid and do not really resist the sale.  I have had inspectors ask me which way I wanted an inspection to go.  I have had inspectors miss MAJOR problems.  And at this point in my real estate career I DON’T feel a home inspection will protect you from a Seller’s or a Realtor’s lies or omitted information.  An inspection will NOT protect you from Structural or Mechanical defects. 

I also do not believe that a Seller getting a home inspection before they list will Show ANY kind of due diligence on their part or prove in any way that they sincerely tried to find ALL problems so that they could have FULL disclosure. 

A home inspector will say what a Seller pays them to say.  I would like to think that a home inspector is impartial. However, I have yet to see that happen in Real Life.

So get an inspection before you list IF you intend to fix The Problems, to back off on the Price for the Real Cost to Really Fix the Problems or if you NEED to know so you can disclose.  But Don’t get a home inspection thinking that it gives you a marketing edge.  It Simply Does Not.

Comment By Chris Fraser, 1-04-08

I appreciate your feedback, and you have provided some interesting points. I know that intent and motive is a big part of the law; so is disclosure. My point isn’t so much on the disclosure side, however to the potential marketing side.

Personally, I have had success with this approach, and always recommend buyers get their own inspection from their own inspector; as for bids too. But I think that this approach sets the stage for open dialogue about a property. When you have tremendous supply on the market, sellers need to
make their houses stand out. Also, if you can avoid hidden issues with the property up front, it could lead to a smoother transaction.

This article was printed from flatheadbeacon.com at the following URL: http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/sellers_get_an_inspection_before_you_list/1702/